The rubric below is not meant to be an absolute scoring guide. Obviously there will be some postings that don't neatly fit into the categories below, and I will adjust grades accordingly. But this will give you an idea of what types of postings will earn high, medium, or low scores.
| Initial post | Response to another student | General scoring criteria |
| 10 | 5 |
The writer clearly connects
his or her answer with material from the textbook. If the question had more than one part, all parts are fully addressed. The answer indicates critical analysis of course material. This may be indicated by connecting different pieces of information to form a whole, by providing an alternative interpretation of course material, or by bringing in outside information which adds new depth to the discussion at hand. Information from the textbook is cited with page numbers. Complete citations (with a reference list) are provided for any information not taken from the textbook. These citations should be from reputable sources. The answer is clearly written, with minimal spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. |
| 7 | 3.5 |
Although the writer answers the question, the
answer is relatively superficial. Answers are not clearly connected to material in the textbook, or outside information is not cited. There are some spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. |
| 4 | 2 |
The answer does not substantially add to the
discussion at hand. The answer may be a personal story that is not
related back to the discussion question; an obvious statement (such as
"child development is fascinating"); or a general response to someone
else of "I agree with you." There are numerous spelling, grammar, punctuation, or organizational issues. |